Other Voices

The Absurdification Of Thought

Wednesday, November 4th, 2009

There is a new opinion piece making the rounds. I have a cousin who shoots these things to me now and then. I’m not sure to what extent she is caught up in any of what follows, but on a quiet Wednesday I took a turn at scoring it. My comments are in blue.

The Vilification of Rush

Liberals would prefer no opposition. Behind the force field of political correctness, there should never be any disagreement once the liberal mind has decided that something is good for society. There can be no opposition to the “correct” way of thinking, and if you don’t think “correctly,” you are attacked.

How deluded is this? Define “political correctness”. Explain how it is a tactic used by the left, but not by the right. Second, please demonstrate where the left discourages debate or discussion by using attack methods. In fact the right wakes up in the morning and starts looking for things to attack. The entire above comment is a classic case of political deflection.
Those who dare to disagree with liberal orthodoxy are punished sooner or later. Not even someone as powerful as Rush Limbaugh, whose dream of part ownership of the St. Louis Rams was shattered by a particularly insidious species of liberal intolerance, is immune.

Actually, Limbaugh was hanged by the fairest of all standards - his own words. I know that some have been mis-attributed or mis-stated, but not all. It is completely fair to draw conclusions about his attitudes, based on things he’s actually said. What exactly is “intolerant” about basing your opinion of a person on what they’ve said? Further, I said from Day One that Limbaugh was not serious about being an NFL owner, he was interested in the theater he knew this would create. He is first, foremost and always a slave to his sponsors, to whom he promises massive ratings. He doesn’t get those by being boring.


This is personal to me — very, very personal. I have watched the news, I have seen television, and I have heard different commentators talk about my friend, all the while knowing the things they say are lies. I am proud to be an American and proud of the United States of America, and again this makes it personal to me. I not only see Rush Limbaugh and the conservative movement in this action being attacked, but the entire foundation of what made America great.

In other words, if we don’t like Limbaugh we are un-American? Classic right-wing move: shut down the discussion by declaring your opposition to be traitors.

Freedom is under attack, and we as Americans need to wake up and stop this madness in the greatest nation ever formed.

I keep hearing this refrain, so it’s time to be specific: How? What madness are we referring to here? How is the country in more danger now than it was before? Taking these last two statements together, is the author implying that Democrats/Liberals are TRYING to destroy the country? All I can say is, if you come around talking like that, you had better have some hard evidence.

Let’s talk about what seems to have happened to Rush Limbaugh. Here is a man who loves professional football almost as much as he loves America’s traditions, values, and heritage of liberty. Rush has dedicated his life to the study of both football and America. He understands America and superbly communicates his understanding with millions every weekday. He understands the game of football, and has influenced it positively by being its biggest fan. Yet Rush has suffered attempts to destroy him with lies, misunderstandings and a direct effort to eliminate his influence in America…over the pretext
of what? A game?

Wait a second. Limbaugh “loves America’s traditions, values, and heritage of liberty”? I must have him confused with somebody else. The Limbaugh with whom I am familiar is as divisive as he could possibly be. It would seem that his idea of “American values” is to find people to mock. He often distorts or invents what others have said, in order to achieve his goal of mockery. He may be a great guy in private, but the Limbaugh we hear on the radio would not be welcome company at any family picnic I can think of. And once again, is the author complaining that Limbaugh’s own words have been used by others to determine their opinion of him? Doesn’t Limbaugh do that to other people 5 days a week?


I truly believe that this is brought on by what I call the Minority Thought Pattern. Let’s not mince words: the Minority Thought Pattern is the total disdain and hatred of what God has accomplished through the white male throughout history. Coming from an African-American, I know this will shock you.

What shocks me is just how many ideological positions this man is trying to stuff down our throats in one paragraph. First: please allow for the simple fact that many of us do not believe that America was singled out by ‘God’. Please allow for the simple fact that not everybody would find plausible an assertion that God has used the white man to accomplish great things. The legacy of white supremacy is not one that many religions would defend. The author’s blackness does not automatically convey astonishing wisdom.

I am not minimizing the accomplishments of women, African-Americans, immigrants, the religious, or anyone else who is part of America. But the white male was here on Plymouth Rock for God to use, and the Pilgrims had a great belief in that God. The nation built out of their efforts, reflecting their values (most especially their religious values), has become the light of liberty for the world and an obstacle to those power-hungry individuals who hate it.

Well, I think it’s fair to say that history is not the author’s strong suit. If he starts from a standpoint that the white man was placed on Plymouth rock so that he could remain dominant throughout history and convert as many people as possible to his religion, there’s not much left to discuss, is there? Suffice it to say that such a view of white supremacy is not even shared by anywhere close to a majority of white people. The above is obscene.

It is critical to understand that not only minorities, but also many whites of both sexes have embraced the Minority Thought Pattern. You see, the minorities in this world do not have the power or the financial backing to accomplish the destruction of the great Judeo-Christian values that are the foundation of America’s greatness.

The above just simply does not complete a coherent thought. He seems to be saying that minorities want more power in order to destroy white religion. Let’s see, does anybody else believe that? Anybody at all?

Spike Lee attempts to change history by criticizing Clint Eastwood for not using black people in his movie about the raising of the flag at Iwo Jima, when in fact there were no black people at Iwo Jima.

Spike Lee was stupid. Next.

The Minority Thought Pattern is the fuel for minorities, and especially African-Americans, to attack the very fabric that has given them the greatest opportunity to accomplish anything they so desire, including the opportunity for a people of slavery to rise and put a slave’s descendant into the White House. (I am still trying to figure out what faction of his ancestry descended from slaves.)

First, I have never heard anybody say that Obama was descended from slaves. For certain he was not. His father was Kenyan, his mother white. Stupid straw man. Very stupid. Second, once again the author is implying that minorities want to tear the country down. That is utter nonsense. Fighting for equal rights is about as American as the Boston Tea Party, so let’s get real here.

The Minority Thought Pattern is aimed at destroying America, at rending the very fabric that makes America great. The Minority Thought Pattern denies the greatness, honor, bravery, courage, humility, and sacrifice that has brought us the power to be the greatest nation that has ever existed. The Minority Thought Pattern has a mission to undermine and redefine every characteristic of America, maintaining that it is a nation based on greed, cowardice, selfishness, and a lack of genuine humility. The Minority Thought Pattern is the reason for all the apologies to the rest of the world for how bad American is, coming even from our top leader.

Wow. Just that last sentence alone. I’m beginning to realize that the author considers “The Minority Thought Pattern” to include any statement that is critical of any expression of American might. All I can say to that is, the Minority to which he refers is clearly in the Majority. We as a nation and as a people reserve to ourselves, at all times, the right to be critical of our leaders and to demand accountability. If he doesn’t like that, maybe he should go form his own country where he can tell everybody what to think. And to state categorically that minorities do not respect the sacrifices of others is so comically preposterous that it has a perfect defense against slander: No clear minded person could possibly be persuaded to believe such a thing.

The problem that America has always had is the lack of understanding of what a conquering nation does. When a nation conquers another it always forces the conquered to assimilate into the conqueror’s culture and ways. We as Americans have always been the great melting pot of society and the world. We want everyone to become just like us.

What the man is saying is that we haven’t done enough to indoctrinate other people to think like we do. But wait a minute, we don’t all think alike. Oh right, that’s a problem too. So the first thing he intends to do is to get us all to think alike. Once he’s done with that, he’ll start working on the rest of the world. Sounds like my kind of American.


The Minority Thought Pattern now wants a nineteen-burner stove with every pot separate and different, and that has given us multiculturalism today. Multiculturalism in its present form has
already proven unworkable. Remember in the South the fight between blacks and whites with the concept of “separate but equal.” Blacks realized that being “separate but equal” is not equality at all. Those separate pots are no different.

At this point it almost makes sense to call off the fight. I have rarely read a paragraph more embarrassing, especially when considering that this is a grown man, an educated man. I think it’s fair to say that none of the above makes the first bit of sense, and leave it at that. If you disagree, let me know.

Who in this modern America decide what is right and wrong, what is politically correct or not? Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, George Soros, Moveon.org, the NFL, the Players Association, and the liberal thinkers and media? I ask, who are the bigots here? The Minority Thought Pattern is the great supporter of ignorant intellectualism. It is the foundation that destroys common sense.

Is the author familiar with the right wing in this country? They spend all day every day telling us who and what is wrong, and it is typically somebody who they accuse of being on the left, and being bad for the country. The author should also be able to explain how Gates and Buffett control the media. Soros and Moveon have staked political ground, just as many do on the right. Once again, the author simply wishes to eliminate speech with which he disagrees.

Over the weekend, Rush spoke to Chris Wallace of Fox News Sunday:

WALLACE: So what do you think that was about? What do you think happened?

RUSH: Well, I think it’s actually about the fact that the NFL is about to lose its current collective bargaining agreement with the players. And guess who happens to be the new executive director of the players association? A guy named DeMaurice Smith, who is Obama. He’s part of his transition team. He has — he has suggested that the Congress, the White House, might get involved in stop a player-owner lockout.

So I — I think — and he got involved in this, too, you know. He was out participating in the spreading of quotes I didn’t say, warning Goodell and the owners what might — I think this was a warning shot
across the bow, saying to the NFL, “Look, we’re going to be close to running this league, not you. We don’t want this guy here.”

And I think — I don’t — I don’t really take this personally, but I do think it was a bunch of cowardice all the way around.

This is a classic example of the Minority Thought Pattern at work, commingling guilty and fearful whites with a sense of rage and grievance from minorities. As result, the game that both Rush and I love has suffered. An American institution, founded by whites but open to and heavily populated by blacks today, is harmed.

No, it’s a classic example of a straw man. Limbaugh said it, so it must be true? It’s not possible for people to think for themselves and draw the conclusion that they just don’t like him? And how is the game of football harmed?

This is extremely personal to me. It’s about a friend. When I look at Rush, I don’t see a white man; I see a friend. I don’t see a talk show host (a very famous talk show host); I see a friend, and friendship overrides color and political stances. I don’t see a controversial figure, but a man whose heart and thoughts I know, and a man who is not a racist.

This explains it. The author has been blinded by friendship. But just as clearly, the author has other issues with this great country of ours. It seems he hates those who disagree with his view of what makes us great. Maybe someday he will see that problem for what it is. And it doesn’t matter whether or not Limbaugh is a racist. It matters that people don’t like him. It must come as a rude awakening, once he leaves his cocoon: there’s a lot of people out there who just don’t like him.

I believe with all my heart that minorities, especially African-Americans, will never be free until they stop allowing people like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton to insist they adopt the mentality of victims. Likewise, they will not be free until they take the next bold step: start thanking God for America, and stop condemning the white male.

The author at last plunges off the deep end. Both Jackson and Sharpton are well known for their messages of empowerment and uplift. Both have been known to be activist in the face of white intolerance, and that is a fair reaction to such treatment. To declare that they promote a “victim” mentality is an outrage and a plain lie.

It is time for America to reject the Minority Thought Pattern and the hateful campaign against Rush Limbaugh.

The author utterly failed to establish what that phrase means and why anybody should assume that it is a problem. This is one of the weakest POVs I have ever read, and I’ve been alive a while and read a lot of things.

This is just embarrassing.

Dr. Kenneth L. Hutcherson, a former NFL linebacker

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Share This Post

Getting It: Joseph C. Phillips

Sunday, August 2nd, 2009

I will give the last word on this topic to actor Joseph C. Phillips.

He gets it.

Share This Post

Merry Christmas Jonny… I miss you!

Wednesday, December 10th, 2008

Dwane T. Hodges is a good friend of Bennett Blog, a frequent commenter and a class human being. He and I have engaged in deep and meaningful discussions here, at the Morris O’Kelly blog and at the New York Times. Many of our discussions share a common theme: public mis-perception regarding the experience of being a black man in the early twenty first century.

Based on a recent exchange, it became clear to me that Dwane has something to share that would do me and perhaps others a lot of good - he has a way of relating his experiences without bitterness or rancor. He really just wants us to understand.

I asked Dwane to author a guest post and he graciously agreed. What follow are his words, unedited an uncut.

Thank you Dwane, for taking the time.

- Walt Bennett

By Dwane T. Hodges

I always think about him at Christmas time.  And why not, Jonny was the man who first got me “interested” in Christ.  He was my number one hang-out buddy in college, and a man everyone knew as my “little brother”.  Jonny could party with the best of them; the brother could dance his behind off.  We even had a routine where we would take two girls on the dance floor, dance them over toward each other, then leave the girls and dance with each other.  We were silly, fun, and wanted to make the world a better place… me through social activism, Jonny through Jesus.  With his influence, I began to incorporate his way into mine.  Had I known that he was going to die at the hands of the police at such a young age, I would have listened a little more, and a little sooner.

Jonny Gammage.  For many, he is the symbol of Clarence Thomas’ high tech lynching in our modern times.  His death made all the major newspapers in the country.  His family was on Oprah.  He had organizations that fight police brutality formed in his name.  Yet, had he not been the cousin of pro football player Ray Seals, he would have been just another of the many guys who die in police custody each year where an “internal investigation” finds no fault.  Johnny was the first post-Rodney King police brutality case to receive national attention.  The difference between he and King was: whereas King was a man who had prior issues with the law, Jonny was a college grad and a businessman who had been the president of our college gospel choir, and was known to be a “choir boy” in most other ways.  He was a good looking man with pretty dark skin and wavy hair that women adored, yet he was always gentlemanly toward them.  He was an inch shorter and 10 lbs. heavier than I was, but at a small 5’7” and 140lbs., he still had a powerful presence.  But most of all, Jonny was a friend to many, and an enemy to none. 

So it’s Christmas, and Jonny is not here.  He was supposed to come visit that Christmas, since it coincided with my sons second birthday and he hadn’t seen him yet… but he died October 12, 1995.  My son turns 15 on December 23rd of this year, so it has been 13 years since Jonny has been gone… and I still miss him.  Not only do I still feel the pain of his passing, I still suffer from the memory of how it happened.  I still remember how my first wife feared that I would lose my mind from grief.  As I was still harassed by the cops in Buffalo on a regular basis, my tension grew to terror.  I never understood before how the KKK burning crosses could cause such fear in people, but now I knew first hand.  Every police car pulling up behind me, or next to me, could be the reason my sons grew up fatherless.  I remembered the time I was pulled out of my car at gunpoint while driving one of my students home because I “looked too young to be driving this car” (verbatim from the officer), and I realized how lucky I was then.  Klan hoods and police badges, or as KRS-one said, Over-seer and officer, it’s the same thing in a different time.  And now that my son is turning 15 years old, in the same way that fathers in the past had to warn their children about how to deal with the Klan, I have to teach my son how to deal with the police.  

It’s a rites(or rights)-of-passage that every Black father has to take his son through.  How to deal with being stopped for walking, running, driving, shopping, sight-seeing, or standing there thinking while Black.  The advanced course comes shortly afterward… how to deal with the police when stopped as a part of a group while Black.  In that case, you have to read the crowd, and adjust the rules from the first lesson accordingly to make sure that 1) you can save everyone in the group, or 2) if you can’t save everyone, save yourself.  Some folks say I am starting my training late.  This is true, but I did give him some basic instruction on simple things like shopping (if you pick up an item, put it in a cart if you plan to buy it.  Never walk out of the aisle with an item in your hand if possible… that can be construed as intention to steal for a Black man).  I found it interesting that Soledad O’Brien, in an interview after her CNN special on Blacks in America, said one of the most painful things she heard about in her research was “the talk”.  She said every man, from celebrities D.L. Hughley and Michael Eric Dyson, to the poorest working class fathers, all said that telling their sons how to “survive” an encounter with the police was a mandatory part of child rearing.  When a co-worker said that all parents need to teach their children how to behave when questioned by the police, she quickly corrected her.  She said its’ not how to behave, it’s how to survive… there is a difference.  Spoken like a woman with black male siblings.  

There is no denying the pain that’s felt by families of people who lose their loved ones in unjust ways by people who are supposed to represent justice.  Even when police self-reported that Jonny begged for his life before he died, no one was punished.  I am one of Barack Obama’s biggest supporters, but I would be a fool to believe that police brutality will disappear because there is a Black president or Attorney General.  Legislation can’t stop hatred, but I don’t care if you hate me… just don’t hit me.  Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., put it best:  “It may be true that the law cannot make a man love me, but it can stop him from lynching me, and that’s pretty important.”  At the very least, Jonny’s killers should have received third degree manslaughter.  But they received nothing,., and those who knew Jonny, either directly through shared lives, or indirectly through shared race, received a reminder that it was still alright to kill a Black man in American if the authorities okayed it.  I’m not anti-police, I’m anti-abuse of authority, and anti-discrimination by authority.  When Fidel Castro came to New York, he made the claim that no White man had ever been convicted of raping a Black woman, and dared someone to find a case. They protested his visit, and attacked many of the things he said, but strangely, no one ever addressed that issue.  I know that none of the White men who raped my mother over the course of her life were even arrested.  No justice, no peace.  Like my mother, Jonny had no justice… and years after the deaths of both of them, I have no peace.  

Yes, its Christmas, and Jonny will be on my mind.  I won’t spoil his birthday or Christmas with finally telling my son how Dad’s friend in the photo album died.  But I will tell him soon afterward.  I hear and read how things have changed, and are changing.  We have a Black president, so that must mean that racism is over.  Black people have irrational fears, our country protects all its citizens equally.  There is no reason to pass on issues of the past to future generations… it’s a new day.  I understand how folks may believe those things… because it looks different.  But that’s the thing about perspective, depending on where “you” move, things always look different.  If your father was a White racist, and you have a mixed group of friends, things look different.  But they still look the same to your father.  And they look the same to your brother who chooses to keep all White friends, because he is a good kid and listened when his father taught him about “those people”.  And like any father, unless your brother changes what he believes before he has children, he will try to pass on his perspective to his children.  They told us back in college that things were different.  The Civil Rights Movement was 20 years in the past.  But ten years later Jonny died at age 31.  So I have to teach from my fears, because the worst fear is that something will happen to “my” son because I failed to teach him.  

Merry Christmas to all.  Happy birthday, son. I Miss you, Jonny.

Share This Post